Evidence Hub

Successful discharge of children with gastroenteritis requiring intravenous rehydration

Freedman SB, DeGroot JM, Parkin PC

The Journal of emergency medicine, 2014

226 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency Department (ED) revisits are very common in children with gastroenteritis administered intravenous rehydration.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine if bicarbonate values are associated with ED revisits in children with gastroenteritis.

METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data, which included children >3 months of age with gastroenteritis treated with intravenous rehydration. Regression analysis was employed to determine whether, among discharged children, bicarbonate independently predicts revisits within 7 days (primary outcome) and successful discharge (secondary outcome). The latter composite outcome measure was defined as discharge at the index visit and the absence of a revisit requiring intravenous rehydration.

RESULTS: Of 226 potentially eligible children, 174 were discharged and were included in the primary outcome analysis. Of the eligible children, 18% (30/174) had a revisit that was predicted by a higher baseline bicarbonate (odds ratio [OR] 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-1.3; p = 0.03), absence of a primary care provider (OR 7.8; 95% CI 1.2-51.0; p = 0.03), and ondansetron administration (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.0-5.5; p = 0.05). Bicarbonate was not associated with successful discharge. Negatively associated independent predictors of successful discharge were volume of intravenous fluids administered (OR 0.84/10 mL/kg increase; 95% CI 0.76-0.93; p < 0.001), and baseline clinical dehydration score (OR 0.75/unit…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 226 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free