Evidence Hub

Single-dose Intravenous Ondansetron in Children with Gastroenteritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Rang NN, Chanh TQ, My PT, Tien TTM

Indian pediatrics, 2019

61 participants · 8 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of ondansetron for the treatment of vomiting and thus reducing the need for intravenous (IV) rehydration in children with gastroenteritis.

DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial.

SETTING: Pediatric ward of An Giang General Hospital, South Vietnam, between December 2013 and June 2014.

PARTICIPANTS: 61 inpatient children (age 11-60 mo) suffering from gastroenteritis with vomiting. Exclusion criteria were: underlying chronic conditions, immunodeficiency, malnutrition or history of allergy to ondansetron.

INTERVENTION: Single bolus of IV ondansetron at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg or placebo.

OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of patients who needed IV rehydration, proportion of patients with cessation of vomiting, amount of oral rehydration solution intake, duration of diarrhea and the length of hospital stay.

RESULTS: After drug administration, 22 (73%) of the 30 patients in the ondansetron group had complete cessation of vomiting compared with 7 (23%) of the 31 patients in the placebo group (RR 0.32; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.63, P<0.001). 3 (10%) patients in the ondansetron group required IV rehydration as compared with 12 (39%) in the placebo group (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.79, P=0.009). The median amount of oral rehydration solution intake in 24 hours was significantly greater in the ondansetron group (450 mL vs 350 mL, P=0.019).The duration of diarrhea and the length of hospital stay were not different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 61 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free