Risk-stratified Randomized Controlled Trial in Paediatric Crohn Disease:Methotrexate Vs Azathioprine or Adalimumab for Maintaining Remission in Patients At Low or High Risk for Aggressive Disease Course, Respectively-a Treatment Strategy
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of weekly subcutaneously administered Methotrexate for maintaining relapse-free sustained steroid/Enteral Nutrition -free 1-year remission compared with:
* daily oral Azathioprine / 6 mercaptopurine in low risk paediatric Crohn's disease
* subcutaneously administered adalimumab in high risk paediatric Crohn's disease
Conditions: Crohn's Disease.
Primary outcome: Rate of sustained steroid/EEN-free remission at Month 12.
Enrollment: 192 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 192 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Patient-Centered Pharmaceutical Design to Improve Acceptability of Medicines: Similarities and Differences in Paediatric and Geriatric Populations
- Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for irritable bowel syndrome 2020
- Phase 2b Study of Pimodivir (JNJ-63623872) as Monotherapy or in Combination With Oseltamivir for Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated Seasonal Influenza A: TOPAZ Trial
- Gastrointestinal manifestations in COVID-19
- COVID-19 and Gastrointestinal Disease: Implications for the Gastroenterologist
- Persistent gut barrier damage and commensal bacterial influx following eradication of Giardia infection in mice
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.