Evidence Hub

Epidemiological characteristics of rotavirus gastroenteritis in China: A systematic review of studies published from 2014 to 2023

Yan-Wei Wu, Xin-Ling Liu, Qingmei Leng, Xiaopeng Song, Jin-Yuan Wu, Mao-Sheng Sun, Yan Zhou, Hong-Jun Li

Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

ABSTRACT Rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) is a major public health concern, particularly amongst children below five-years-old. In China, the disease burden remains high owing to the absence of a comprehensive detection system. This study analyses RVGE incidence, population distribution, and pathogenic genotypes reported in studies published between 2014 and 2023, providing evidence to support vaccine and drug development. A systematic review of studies on RVGE published between 2014 and 2023 was conducted. Articles were screened using a standardized algorithm. A random-effects model was employed to analyze rotavirus positive rates and genotype variation trends. Among 320 studies, the highest rotavirus positive rates in children (≤5 y) were in Jilin (48.59%), Shanxi (40.89%), and Xinjiang (37.65%), while the highest number of infections were in Yunnan (89,128), Jiangsu (82,869), and Guangxi (36,524). Among adults (≥15 y), Shaanxi (27.73%), Inner Mongolia (22.95%), and Heilongjiang (17.82%) had the highest rotavirus positive rates, whereas Shanghai (3,170), Beijing (2,019), and Fujian (1,044) recorded the most infections. The rotavirus positive rates were 26.46% and 32.85% for children visiting the outpatient/emergency department and the inpatient department, respectively. Before 2018, the dominant G genotypes were G9 (children: 42.89%; adults: 56.13%) and G3 (children: 20.17%; adults: 14.71%), whereas the dominant P genotype was P[8] (children: 76.30%; adults: 80.78%). After…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free