Evidence Hub

Indirect protection from rotavirus vaccines: a systematic review

Tyler P. Chavers, Jordan E. Cates, E. Burnett, U. Parashar, J. Tate

Expert Review of Vaccines, 2024

110 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Rotavirus vaccines may provide indirect protection by reducing transmission in the population and thus reducing disease burden. Methods This systematic review summarizes estimates of indirect protection from rotavirus vaccines and the methods used to obtain these estimates. Results We identified 71 studies published between 2009 and 2022 that provided 399 estimates of indirect protection from rotavirus vaccine. Most estimates (73%) evaluated hospitalizations due to rotavirus gastroenteritis as the outcome and unvaccinated children <5 years old as the agegroup (64%), but there was considerable variability in methods to evaluate indirect protection. For hospitalizations due to rotavirus gastroenteritis among unvaccinated children <5 years old, the median incidence rate ratio was 0.60 (IQR: 0.40–0.87, n = 110 estimates), the median relative percent change in percent positivity was 25% (IQR: 13–44%, n = 49 estimates), and the median relative percent change in absolute number of rotavirus positive tests or rotavirus-specific International Classification of Diseases codes was 42% (IQR: 16–66%, n = 40 estimates). Conclusions These findings broadly suggest rotavirus vaccines provide some indirect protection. There is a need to standardize measurement of indirect rotavirus vaccine protection, particularly using consistent outcomes and metrics, and stratifying results by standardized age groups and years since vaccine introduction.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 110 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free