Evidence Hub

Aprepitant Use in Pediatric Cyclical Vomiting Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Nabeel Ahmad, Saad Bin Toufeeq, Hooria Rehman, Muhammad Talha, Muhammad Shahid, Hassam Suleman

Pakistan Journal of Gastroenterology, 2026

1,775 participants

Abstract

Background: Cyclical vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a disorder of gut–brain interaction characterized by recurrent, stereotyped episodes of intense nausea and vomiting with return to baseline in between. Pediatric CVS often leads to frequent hospitalizations, comorbidities, and poor quality of life. Standard abortive therapies include 5-HT₃ antagonists (e.g. ondansetron) and

triptans, while prophylaxis may involve cyproheptadine or amitriptyline. Aprepitant, an oral neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonist approved for chemotherapy-induced nausea, is increasingly used off-label in refractory pediatric CVS. Its efficacy and safety in this setting remain unclear.

Methods: We conducted a PRISMA-style systematic review of studies reporting on aprepitant in pediatric CVS. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 15 January 2025 for any study (randomized trials, cohorts, case series, reports)

of aprepitant in children (<18) with CVS. Two reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using standard tools. Outcomes were patient-reported response (episode frequency/intensity), healthcare utilization (episodes/year, admissions), and

adverse events. Due to heterogeneity, results are summarized narratively.

Results: No randomized controlled trials were identified. Evidence consisted of one retrospective controlled cohort study, one retrospective single-center case series, and one case report, with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,775 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free