Evidence Hub

Effect of Lung-Protective Ventilation on Changes in Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation During Thoracoscopic Surgery in Children: A Prospective, Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial

Guo-Liang Liu, Fang Wang, Li-Jing Li, Tie-Hua Zheng, Zheng-Zheng Gao, Jian-Min Zhang

Children, 2026

52 participants

Abstract

Highlights What are the main findings? For children undergoing thoracoscopic surgery with one-lung ventilation, lung-protective ventilation (4–6 mL/kg tidal volume plus 5 cmH2O PEEP) was associated with a markedly lower rate of intraoperative cerebral desaturation (≥20% fall in regional cerebral oxygen saturation), relative to conventional ventilation (8–10 mL/kg tidal volume, no PEEP). Patients receiving lung-protective ventilation exhibited higher nadir regional cerebral oxygen saturation values. Desaturation events decreased by more than 60% (14.6% versus 37.5%). Post-operative pulmonary complication rates fell by over half (14.6% versus 33.3%), and no pneumothorax cases occurred in this group. Median postoperative length-of-stay was one-day shorter in the lung-protective ventilation arm (4.0 versus 5.0 days), reflecting faster clinical recovery. What is the implication of the main finding? Low-tidal-volume ventilation (4–6 mL/kg during one-lung ventilation) was clinically feasible and well-tolerated. It maintained adequate surgical exposure without safety concerns, lending support for considering this protective strategy for pediatric one-lung-ventilation procedures. This work demonstrates the potential value of near-infrared spectroscopy to detect cerebral deoxygenation missed by pulse oximetry. The findings indicate that combined use of this monitor with lung-protective ventilation warrants further evaluation for optimizing paediatric perioperative care. Abstract…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 52 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free