Evidence Hub

Immunogenicity of a third scheduled dose of rotavirus vaccine in Australian Indigenous infants to improve protection against gastroenteritis: a phase IV, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial

B. Middleton, M. Danchin, Mark A. Jones, A. Leach, N. Cunliffe, C. D. Kirkwood, Jonathan Carapetis, S. Gallagher et al.

medRxiv, 2021

178 participants

Abstract

Background: The oral rotavirus vaccine, Rotarix (GlaxoSmithKline), is licensed for use in infants as two doses in the first six months of life. For infants living in settings with high child-mortality, and also for rural and remote Australian Aboriginal infants, clinical protection conferred by two doses of Rotarix appear to be reduced. We assessed the effect of an additional dose of Rotarix on vaccine immune responses among Aboriginal children who are 6 to < 12 months old. Methods: ORVAC is a two-stage, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial conducted across regional urban and remote locations of Australia's Northern Territory. Aboriginal children aged 6 to < 12 months old who had received one or two prior doses of Rotarix were randomised 1:1 to receive an additional dose of Rotarix or matched placebo. The primary immunological endpoint was seroresponse defined as an anti-rotavirus IgA level < 20 AU/ml, approximately one month following Rotarix or placebo. Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02941107). Findings: Between March 2018 and August 2020, 253 infants were enrolled. Of these, 178 infants (70%) had analysable serological results after follow-up; 89 randomised to Rotarix and 89 randomised to placebo. The proportion with a seroresponse was 85% after Rotarix compared to 71% after placebo; the probability of a higher seroresponse in the Rotarix than the placebo arm was 99%. There was no occurrences of intussusception or any serious adverse events attributed to Rotarix or…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 178 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free