Evidence Hub

Infections and antibiotic use in early childhood have limited importance in developing manifest type 1 diabetes – The ABIS cohort study

Malin Bélteky, Jeanette Wahlberg, J. Ludvigsson

Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2025

168 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Aims To investigate the effect of early childhood infections and antibiotic use on the risk of type 1 diabetes in a general population cohort. Research Design and Methods The All Babies In Southeast Sweden (ABIS) cohort followed 16 428 children from birth. Questionnaires collected at 1 year (n=11 093), 3 years (n=8 890) and 5 years of age (n=7 445) included data on infections and antibiotic use and were validated against national registers. After a mean follow-up of 25 years, 168 individuals have been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (1.0% of the original cohort, aged 1-24.5 years). Results There were few significant differences in type or frequency of early childhood infections or antibiotic use between cases with type 1 diabetes and the reference group (remaining individuals who did not develop type 1 diabetes) after adjusting for sex, heredity and socioeconomic status. A small number of type 1 diabetes children (4.8% compared to 0.8% of the reference group) reported six or more episodes of gastroenteritis in the 1-3-year age group, resulting in an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 8.21; 95% CI 2.70-25.01, p<0.001. Cases of type 1 diabetes with an increased genetic risk (n=91) reported fewer episodes of the common cold between 1 and 3 years of age compared to the reference group (aOR 0.27; 0.13-0.58, p<0.001). Individuals with type 1 diabetes without risk-associated HLA alleles (n=14) reported a higher frequency of pneumonia in the 1–3- and 3–5-year age group (aOR 26.08;…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 168 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free