Evidence Hub

Contribution of the FilmArray® Gastrointestinal Panel in the laboratory diagnosis of gastroenteritis in a cohort of children: a two-year prospective study

A. Calderaro, M. Martinelli, Mirko Buttrini, Sara Montecchini, S. Covan, S. Rossi, F. Ferraglia, Paolo Montagna et al.

International Journal of Medical Microbiology, 2018

1,703 participants · 34 citations

Abstract

This study represents a 2-year picture of the epidemiology of enteric pathogens in children suffering from gastroenteritis using the FilmArray® Gastrointestinal Panel (FA-GP), a multiplex molecular assay that allows to simultaneously detect a large panel of pathogens independently of the etiological suspicion and to evaluate its potential contribution to the diagnosis compared to the conventional methods. A total of 1716 stool samples, collected from children with clinical suspicion of bacterial and/or viral gastroenteritis attending the University Hospital of Parma, was submitted to the FA-GP and, when an adequate aliquot was available, to electron microscopy (n = 1163) for virus detection and to an enterovirus-targeting real-time PCR (n = 1703). Specimens with positive results for Salmonella, Yersinia enterocolitica, Vibrio, diarrheagenic Escherichia coli/Shigella, Campylobacter, Plesiomonas shigelloides and/or parasites by the FA-GP were also submitted to conventional diagnostic methods. The FA-GP gave positive results in 958 (55.8%) cases, 64.8% from inpatients: 647 (67.5%) contained a single agent and 311 (32.5%) multiple agents, for a total of 1374 pathogens. Enteropathogenic E. coli, rotavirus, norovirus, toxigenic Clostridioides difficile, and sapovirus were the most commonly detected pathogens. A total of 812 additional agents (344 of which as single pathogen) was detected by the FA-GP and not included in the clinical suspicion. The overall recovery rate of the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,703 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free