Evidence Hub

Epidemiology of norovirus disease in the first two years of life: a prospective multisite cohort study in Lima, Peru

C. Lanata, Giselle Soto, Ana I Gil, Joan Neyra, Rubelio Cornejo, Candice Romero, L. Ecker, M. L. Huaylinos et al.

International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2024

498 participants · 5 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Norovirus is associated with 18% of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) cases worldwide. We aim to document the norovirus-related AGE incidence in peri-urban areas of Lima (Peru), evaluating the potential impact of a norovirus vaccine introduction.

METHODS

A prospective, community-based pediatric cohort study was established at two sites in Lima. Healthy children between 5 and 18 months were contacted weekly for AGE detection during a 6-month period. Stool samples from AGE cases were tested for norovirus by RT-PCR. Incidence and coinfection of norovirus-associated AGE were analyzed. All norovirus-positive samples were genotyped by Sanger DNA sequencing.

RESULTS

Among 498 enrolled children, 461 (93%) completed the follow-up period. We detected 799 AGE cases, yielding 676 valid stool samples. Norovirus was detected in 216 samples (32%), with an incidence of 7.7 episodes per 100 child-months (95% CI: 6.7-8.8). Genotypes GII.4 (31%) and GII.6 (22%) were frequent. Campylobacter (43%) and Salmonella spp. (15%) were the most common coinfections with norovirus. Ninety-five percent of study children had received an oral rotavirus vaccine.

CONCLUSION

Norovirus was the second most frequent cause of AGE in this Peruvian cohort with high rotavirus vaccine coverage. An effective norovirus vaccine would have an important public health benefit in this population.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 498 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free