Evidence Hub

Comparative assessment of treatment outcomes of empagliflozin add-on metformin and sitagliptin add-on metformin therapies in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus: findings from an observational study in Pakistan

Khan AU, Sharif MJH, Ashfaq M, Khan Q, Iqbal MM, Iqbal A, Bashatah A, Syed W et al.

Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2025

155 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus warrant the utilization of different combination antidiabetic therapies, however, the addition of these newer agents as add-on therapy increases the risk of side effects and needs to be further investigated in terms of their risk to benefit to the patient. Therefore, the current study aims to evaluate the clinical and safety outcomes in patients taking empagliflozin and Sitagliptin in addition to metformin.

METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a non-probability consecutive sampling technique to gather data at the Diabetes and Foot Care Clinic in Abbottabad from July 2023 to December 2023. This is an exploratory observational study in which a total of 155 study participants were selected and divided into two groups: Group A, treated with Sitagliptin add-on Metformin (n = 79), and Group B, treated with Empagliflozin add-on Metformin (n = 76), Biochemical parameters (HbA1c, serum creatinine) were collected and eGFR was calculated at baseline and after a 3-month follow-up. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 23.

RESULTS: Among the participant's majority (53.5%) were males whereas the mean age of the participants was 51.7 ± 10.5 years. Baseline HbA1c and serum creatinine of all the patients were found to be 9.5 ± 1.8% and 1.02 ± 0.2 mg/dL respectively. There was a statistically significant decrease in mean HbA1c values in both the groups at baseline and follow-up (p < 0.001) whereas both…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 155 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free