Evidence Hub

Interventions for Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli gastroenteritis and risk of hemolytic uremic syndrome: A population-based matched case control study

S. Myojin, K. Pak, Mayumi Sako, Tohru Kobayashi, Takuri Takahashi, T. Sunagawa, N. Tsuboi, K. Ishikura et al.

PLoS ONE, 2022

7,760 participants · 12 citations

Abstract

Background The role of antibiotics in the treatment of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) infection is controversial. Objectives To evaluate the association between treatment (antibiotics, antidiarrheal agents, and probiotics) for STEC infection and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) development. Patients and methods We performed a population-based matched case-control study using the data from the National Epidemiological Surveillance of Infectious Diseases (NESID) between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018. We identified all patients with STEC infection and HUS as cases and matched patients with STEC infection without HUS as controls, with a case-control a ratio of 1:5. Further medical information was obtained by a standardized questionnaire. Multivariable conditional logistic regression model was used. Results 7760 patients with STEC infection were registered in the NESID. 182 patients with HUS and 910 matched controls without HUS were selected. 90 patients with HUS (68 children and 22 adults) and 371 patients without HUS (266 children and 105 adults) were included in the main analysis. The matched ORs of any antibiotics and fosfomycin for HUS in children were 0.56 (95% CI 0.32–0.98), 0.58 (0.34–1.01). The matched ORs for HUS were 2.07 (1.07–4.03), 0.86 (0.46−1.61) in all ages treated with antidiarrheal agent and probiotics. Conclusions Antibiotics, especially fosfomycin, may prevent the development of HUS in children, while use of antidiarrheal agents should…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 7,760 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free