Evidence Hub

Morbidity patterns and factors associated with mortality in the Inpatient Therapeutic Feeding Centre in Abs General Hospital, Yemen: an unmatched case-control study

S.-L. Yang, M. González, HA Hazaea Mohammed, SY Lim, E. Ferreras, A. Luczynska, M. Escruela, AV Valori et al.

Morbidity patterns and factors associated with mortality in the Inpatient Therapeutic Feeding Centre in Abs General Hospital, Yemen: an unmatched case-control study, 2024

280 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Inpatient Therapeutic Feeding Centre (ITFC) in Abs General Hospital, Yemen, provides nutrition treatment and management of medical complications to children affected by the humanitarian crisis in Abs and surrounding areas. In the past 2 years, the monthly mortality rate for children younger than 14 years averaged at 2.5–5% during non-peak months (Médecins Sans Frontières [MSF] indicator threshold for ITFC is 5%), but it increased to 7% during the peak months. We aimed to describe ITFC patients’ demographic, anthropometric, and clinical variables, and assess their association with inpatient mortality.

METHODS

We conducted an unmatched case-control study with patients aged <14 years who attended IFTC between January and December 2022. Cases were patients for whom the ITFC exit was recorded as “death” (n=106), and controls were those with the exit recorded as “discharged”, selected via systematic random sampling (n=218). Descriptive statistics were performed for all variables. We assessed associations with mortality by calculating adjusted odds ratios (aORs) via multivariable logistic regression, controlling for factors significant in the univariable analysis.

RESULTS

About 77% of patients were aged ≥6 months (71/106 cases and 178/218 controls). Gender distribution was even in both groups. The median mid-upper arm circumference was 88 mm in patients aged <6 months and 104 mm in those aged ≥6 months; 89% of the patients had weight-for-height Z score of <–3. The most…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 280 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free