Evidence Hub

Assessment of Pulmonary Function in Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Cross-Sectional Study

Şeyda Doğantan, S. Taşkın, Cansu Yılmaz Yeğit, Ali Özdemir

Children, 2025

70 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by joint inflammation, potentially leading to pulmonary involvement. This study aimed to assess pulmonary function in children with JIA compared to controls and identify potential respiratory abnormalities associated with the disease. Methods: This was a prospective cross-sectional study conducted at the Pediatric Rheumatology, Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye, between July and October 2024. The study included 70 children with JIA and 60 healthy controls aged 6 to 17. Pulmonary function test parameters, such as forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the 1st second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), and FEV1/FVC ratio, were measured using spirometry. Oxygen saturation (SpO2) was also measured. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between the JIA and control groups (p > 0.05). FVC and FEV1 values were lower in the JIA group, though not significantly (p = 0.831 and p = 0.711). However, PEF was significantly lower in the JIA group than controls (p = 0.005). Children with moderate or high disease activity had significantly lower FVC, FEV1, and FEF 25–75 than those with low disease activity (p < 0.001). Enthesitis-related arthritis patients had higher FVC and FEV1 than other JIA subtypes (p < 0.05). FVC and FEV1 were positively correlated with BMI (p < 0.001). Conclusions:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 70 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free