Evidence Hub

Impact of Stunting on Outcomes of Severely Wasted Children (6 Months to 5 Years) Admitted for Inpatient Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study in an Ethiopian Referral Hospital

Serena Pappalardo, Eleni Hagos Giday, Sisay Zeleke Jijo, Francesco Cavallin, E. Facci, G. Putoto, F. Manenti, C. Banzato et al.

Children, 2025

616 participants

Abstract

Background: Undernutrition is a major public health concern, accounting for nearly half of global under-five mortalities and leading to serious long-term consequences for those who survive. Most nutritional screening programs give priority to acute undernutrition (wasting). The co-presence of chronic undernutrition (stunting) has been shown to have the highest risk of mortality. To date, few studies have assessed outpatient treatment outcomes of children with wasting + stunting (WaSt), with some inconsistencies in results and only one study having investigated the outcome of patients requiring hospitalization. The aim of the present study is to investigate the impact of stunting on the outcomes of severely wasted children admitted for inpatient treatment in an Ethiopian referral hospital. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to compare treatment outcomes (length of hospital stay, weight gain, recovery rate, readmission rate) of wasted and WaSt children admitted to “St. Luke Catholic Hospital and College of Nursing and Midwifery” between January 2018 and February 2023. Results: The analysis comprised 616 children aged 6–60 months and stunting was diagnosed in 559 children (90.7%). Children with stunting had a longer length of stay (median difference 3 days, 95% confidence interval 0 to 5; p = 0.03) and improved weight gain (median difference 4 g/kg/day, 95% confidence interval 0 to 4; p = 0.002) compared to children without stunting. Discharge rate (p…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 616 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free