Evidence Hub

Parental Reports of Oral Health Behaviours and Dental Caries in Romanian Children and Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study

Darius Dacian Macavei, R. Iurcov, A. Moca, Rebeca Daniela Marton, Gabriela Ciavoi, L. Vaida

Children, 2026

508 participants

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Dental caries remains one of the most prevalent chronic diseases in childhood, influenced by a combination of hygiene, dietary, and access-related behaviours that are largely shaped by parental involvement. This study aimed to evaluate oral hygiene habits, dietary risk factors, access to dental services, awareness of caries prevention, and the impact of oral health on the child, in relation to parent-reported dental caries in Romanian children and adolescents. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured online questionnaire completed by parents or legal guardians of 508 children and adolescents aged under 18 years. Associations between categorical variables and reported caries were assessed using chi-square tests and Cramér’s V. Ordinal variables were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. A multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of reported caries, with robustness examined through sensitivity analyses. Results: Parent-reported caries was present in 61.2% of children. The strongest associations with caries were the absence of parental supervision during brushing (Cramér’s V = 0.364), the age at which children began brushing unsupervised (V = 0.354), and the reason for the last dental visit (V = 0.426). In the multivariable model, older age, absence of brushing supervision, sweets before bedtime, less frequent dental visits, and rural residence were independent predictors (all p < 0.05; Nagelkerke R2 =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 508 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free