Evidence Hub

Exploratory Biological Correlates of Cognitive and Language Performance in Healthy Pubertal Children: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Merve Savaş, Senanur Kahraman Beğen, Ömer Okuyan, Hafize Uzun

Children, 2026

156 participants

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Adolescence is a dynamic neurodevelopmental period during which structured language performance may reflect ongoing biological reorganization processes. This study examined whether inflammatory, nutritional, and hormonal biomarkers were modestly associated with structured language task performance and cognitive performance in healthy pubertal children. Methods: A total of 156 healthy pubertal children (78 female, 78 male; mean age of 11.84 ± 2.98 years) meeting Tanner Stage ≥ 2 were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Language was assessed with the Test of Language Development-Primary: Fourth Edition (TOLD-P:4; Turkish adaptation) and cognition with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (WISC-R). Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV), Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI), Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), vitamin B12, 25-OH vitamin D, ferritin, and TSH were included as biomarkers. Two-block hierarchical OLS regression and Spearman correlations with Benjamini–Hochberg FDR correction were used. Results: The biomarker block provided a statistically significant incremental contribution to the spoken language model (ΔR2 = 0.066, p = 0.041; full model R2 = 0.287). The primary test statistic was ΔR2. In exploratory coefficient-level analyses that were not corrected for multiple comparisons, the PIV (β = +0.17, p = 0.033) and TSH (β = −0.17, p = 0.031) coefficients reached nominal significance. After FDR correction, PIV was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 156 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free