Evidence Hub

Neurocognitive, Social-Cognitive and Quality of Life Differences in Children with Advanced Heart Failure: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study

D. Çelik, A. Kapkın, N. Ozbaran, Nagehan Demiral, Zülal Ülger Tutar, U. Kahraman, O. N. Tuncer, Ahmet Daylan et al.

Children, 2026

7 participants

Abstract

Highlights What are the main findings? • Decreased global cognition (WISC-IV), social cognition (Eyes Test), health-related quality of life (both child and parent), higher parent-reported anxiety, and similar child-reported anxiety.• No cognitive differences among the LVAD/transplant/waiting groups. What are the implications of the main findings? • Parent and child self-reports provide complementary information.• Neurocognitive vulnerability exists in all heart failure patient groups. Healthcare should be planned considering the neurocognitive and social development. Abstract Background: Children with heart failure (HF) are at risk of cognitive and psychiatric problems, and reduced health-related quality of life (QoL), yet data remain limited. This study compared neurocognition, social cognition, health-related quality of life, and psychiatric symptoms among children awaiting transplantation with or without ventricular assist devices (VADs), those who had undergone heart transplantation, and matched controls. Methods: Twenty-three patients at Ege University and 17 age- and sex-matched controls were assessed using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Aged Children, Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL), Screen for Child Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED), Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI), Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition (WISC-IV), Eyes Test, and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), evaluating…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 7 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free