Evidence Hub

Socio-Emotional, Behavior and Cognitive Disorders Associated with Exposure to Trace Metals: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study in School-Age Children in Haut-Katanga Province

E. B. Mbuyamba, Jean-Paul Ngoy Mande, P. M. Obadia, Celestin Banza Lubaba Nkulu, V. Haufroid, B. Nemery, C. Mulumba, Abdon Mukalay Wa Mukalay et al.

Children, 2025

Abstract

Introduction: Trace metals can negatively impact biological functions and brain development. Cognitive and neurobehavioral disorders in children are poorly documented in Haut-Katanga Province, an area with significant and multiple exposures to trace metals that can lead to the exacerbation of cognitive and behavioral disorders. Objective: This study aimed to characterize the behavior of schoolchildren linked to their cognitive performance in urban and rural environments. Methods: A cross-sectional pilot study was conducted on 52 schoolchildren aged 6 to 11 (22 from rural areas presumed less exposed to metals and 30 from Lubumbashi, DRC). This study employed NEPSY-II tests, the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Tutor), ENA 2020 software and trace metal spectrometry assays. Statistical tests were carried out with SPSS-20 and Stata-18. Results: Our findings revealed a correlation between children’s malnutrition and low mother’s education. The “total difficulties score” was more prevalent in rural areas (73%) compared to urban settings (37%) p 0.05). Urban children demonstrated superior cognitive performance, particularly in “facial affect recognition” (8 versus 4, p = 0.013) and “inhibitory control” (6.5 versus 3, p = 0.032). As-U(urine), Cd-B(blood), Hg-B, Mo-U, Ni-U, Pb-U, Pb-B and Sb-U were elevated compared to references. In general, urban areas had higher metal levels than rural areas. Blood and urine metals showed a complex and significant relationship with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free