Evidence Hub

Outbreak investigation of norovirus gastroenteritis in a childcare facility in Central Queensland, Australia: a household level case series analysis

Connie Schulz, Amanda Wyatt, J. Walker, Nicolas R Smoll, Emma Field, G. Khandaker

Communicable diseases intelligence, 2024

41 participants

Abstract

Introduction

Noroviruses are one of the most common causes of gastroenteritis in all age groups, including children. However, little has been reported on the transmission of norovirus within childcare facilities and the subsequent impact at the household level.

Methods

We conducted an outbreak investigation of norovirus gastroenteritis in Central Queensland, Australia during May 2021, in a childcare facility and the associated exposed households. Case definitions and outbreak management were employed as per the Communicable Disease Network Australia guidelines for norovirus and suspected viral gastroenteritis. Each case or carer and respective household member was interviewed to determine the date and time of symptom onset, health outcomes, and infector-infectee pairs. We estimated attack rates within the childcare facility and households, and basic reproductive number (R0) for norovirus using time-dependent methods.

Results

A total of 41 people developed gastrointestinal symptoms as a result of this outbreak, with 25 cases (61%) acquiring the infection in the centre and 16 cases (39%) occurring at households. Serial intervals were estimated as a mean 2.4 days (standard deviation 1.7 days), with a majority of cases (73%) in children under two years of age within the centre. Three faecal specimens were obtained, all detecting norovirus genotype II. The time-dependent R0 was 1.5 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.0-2.2).

Discussion

The attack rate within the childcare…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 41 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free