Evidence Hub

Evaluation of rotavirus vaccine effectiveness by severity of rotavirus disease: findings from the MNSSTER-V project

M. C. Moran, J. Cates, Neha Balachandran, Jazmina Umaña, Helah Safi, Hammarskjold Makhuza, V. Iñiguez, Trang van Nguyen et al.

The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2026

18,426 participants

Abstract

Background. Since the introduction of rotavirus vaccines, acute gastroenteritis (AGE) hospitalizations due to rotavirus have decreased globally; however, vaccine effectiveness (VE) differs by country, age, and disease severity. We evaluated rotavirus VE by disease severity in different age groups and under-5 childhood mortality (U5M) strata. Methods. The Vesikari score is a common measure of AGE disease severity. A modified Vesikari Score (mVS) was calculated for 18,426 children with medically-attended AGE across 16 countries from the Multi-National Subpopulations Study To Evaluate Rotavirus Vaccines dataset. Using a test-negative case-control design (cases had rotavirus-positive AGE and controls had rotavirus-negative AGE), we calculated complete rotavirus series VE against different severity categories among children aged 6–59 months, stratified by age and country U5M level. Results. VE increased with increasing disease severity, 38% (95% confidence interval [CI]:17–53) for mild/moderate disease vs 58% (95% CI: 50–64) for severe/very severe disease, and this pattern persisted with stratification by age and U5M. Among children with severe/very severe disease, VE was higher in infants aged 6–11 months (62%, 95% CI: 51–70) compared to children aged 24–59 months (11%, 95% CI: −78–56), and lower among children in the highest U5M strata (44%, 95% CI: 26–58) compared to children in the high U5M strata (60%, 95% CI: 47–69). Conclusions. Rotavirus vaccines provide the greatest…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 18,426 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free