Evidence Hub

Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Circulating Cyclophilin A Levels in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

F. Kilic, Fulya Odabaş, Abdulkadir Iltas, Oğuz Akkuş, R. Akıllı, Gulcin Daglioglu, Gamze Akkuş

Current Medicinal Chemistry, 2025

38 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate cyclophilin (CypA) levels in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) before and after treatment. Metabolic variables, such as weight, blood pressure, and plasma glucose, were assessed in these patients.

METHOD

This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted over 24 weeks. We included 38 patients with DM. After confirming the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, SGLT2i (empagliflozin vs dapagliflozin) therapy was prescribed to the patients. Weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, body fat ratio, fasting plasma glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c, %), and CypA levels were measured at 0, 12, and 24 weeks. Patients in the drug subgroup were divided into 2 groups: Empagliflozin (Empa, n=16) and Dapagliflozin (Dapa, n=22).

RESULTS

Weight (p<0.001), body mass index (p<0.001), percentage of body fat (p<0.001), diastolic blood pressure (p=0.006), fasting plasma glucose (p<0.001), HbA1c (p<0.001), serum creatinine (p<0.001), and CypA (p<0.001) levels after the SGLT2i therapy were statistically decreased compared to pre-treatment values in all patients. When comparing drug subgroups, significant decreases in weight (p=0.013) and percentage body fat (p=0.01) were observed in the Empa group compared with the Dapa group at 24 weeks. Changes in FPG (p=0.399), HbA1c (p=0.102), and CypA (p=0.329) between the two groups seemed to be similar.

CONCLUSION

Beyond the improvement of metabolic parameters, SGLT2 treatment reduced CypA levels in patients…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 38 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free