Evidence Hub

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-group Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Once-Daily Administration of TAK-438 10 or 20 mg Compared to Lansoprazole 15 mg in the Maintenance Treatment of Subjects With Endoscopic Healing of Erosive Esophagitis

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2018

703 participants

Abstract

This is a comparative study of vonoprazan (TAK-438) (10 mg or 20 mg) in participants in whom endoscopic healing of erosive esophagitis has been confirmed with vonoprazan or adequate treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), to demonstrate the non-inferiority of vonoprazan to lansoprazole in their maintenance treatment (6 months or 24 weeks) as well as to determine the clinically recommended dose for vonoprazan for maintenance therapy in erosive esophagitis.

Conditions: Erosive Esophagitis.

Primary outcome: Percentage of Participants With Recurrence of Erosive Esophagitis as Confirmed on Endoscopy After the 24-week Maintenance Phase.

Enrollment: 703 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 703 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free