Evidence Hub

Long-term exposure to ambient fine particles and gastrointestinal cancer mortality in Taiwan: A cohort study

Cui Guo, T. Chan, Yung-Chu Teng, Changqing Lin, Ya-Cong Bo, Ly-yun Chang, Alexis K. H. Lau, Tony Tam et al.

Environment International, 2020

385,650 participants · 72 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Information on the association between long-term exposure to PM2.5 and gastrointestinal cancer mortality is scarce.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the association between long-term exposure to PM2.5 and deaths from gastrointestinal cancer and its subtypes in adults in Taiwan.

METHODS

A total of 385,650 Taiwanese adults (≥18 years old) jointed a standard medical examination program between 2001 and 2014 and were followed up until 2016. Their vital data were obtained from the National Death Registry maintained by the Ministry of Health and Welfare in Taiwan. We estimated the ambient PM2.5 concentration at individual's address utilising a satellite-based spatiotemporal model at a resolution of 1 km2. Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to investigate the associations between ambient PM2.5 and deaths from gastrointestinal, stomach, colorectal and liver cancers.

RESULTS

We found that each 10 µg/m3 increase in PM2.5 was associated with an increased hazard risk (HR) of 1.09 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.16) and 1.13 (95%CI: 1.02-1.24) in deaths from gastrointestinal and liver cancers, respectively. The association between PM2.5 and death from colorectal cancer was marginally statistically significant [HR: 1.13 (95%CI: 1.00-1.26)]. We did not find significant associations between PM2.5 and mortality from stomach cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term exposure to ambient PM2.5 was associated with an increased risk of deaths from gastrointestinal cancers,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 385,650 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free