Evidence Hub

Exposure to multiple metals in early pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study

Xiaoyi Wang, Duan Gao, Guofu Zhang, Xu Zhang, Qian Li, Qin Gao, Renjuan Chen, Shangzhi Xu et al.

Environment International, 2019

2,090 participants · 133 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A growing number of epidemiologic studies have estimated associations between type 2 diabetes mellitus and exposure to metals. However, studies on the associations of internal assessments of metal exposure and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are limited in scope and have inconsistent outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

This investigation aimed to explore the associations between urinary nickel (Ni), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), antimony (Sb), cobalt (Co), or vanadium (V) in early pregnancy and the subsequent risk of GDM in Chinese pregnant women.

METHODS

The study population included 2090 women with singleton pregnancy from the Tongji Maternal and Child Health Cohort (TMCHC). Urine samples were collected before 20 gestational weeks, and an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was conducted at 24-28 gestational weeks to diagnose GDM. The concentrations of urinary metals were measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and were corrected for urinary creatinine. The associations between the risk of GDM and urinary metals were assessed using Poisson regression with a robust error variance with generalized estimating equations (GEE) models and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR).

RESULTS

A total of 241 participants (11.53%) were diagnosed with GDM. Five metals (Ni, As, Sb, Co, and V) were found significantly and positively associated with GDM based on single-metal models. In multiple-metal models, for each unit increase of ln-transformed urinary Ni or…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2,090 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free