Evidence Hub

A Multicenter, Longitudinal Cohort Study of Cryptococcosis in HIV-Negative People in the United States

K. Marr, Yifei Sun, A. Spec, Na Lu, A. Panackal, J. Bennett, P. Pappas, D. Ostrander et al.

Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2019

145 participants · 73 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cryptococcosis is increasingly recognized in people without HIV.

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective cohort study was performed in 25 U.S. centers. Consenting patients were prospectively followed for up to 2 years. Neurologic morbidities were assessed with longitudinal event depiction and functional scores (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA). Risks for death were analyzed using Cox regression.

RESULTS

145 subjects were enrolled. Most were male (95, 65.5%) and had immunosuppression (120, 82.8%), including solid organ transplant (SOT, 33.8%), autoimmunity (15.9%), and hematologic malignancies (11.7%). Disease involved the central nervous system (CNS) in 71 subjects (49%). Fever was uncommon, documented in 40 (27.8%) subjects, and absence was associated with diagnostic delay (mean 48.2 vs. 16.5 days, p=0.007). Abnormal MoCA scores (1 lumbar puncture and eight (11.3%) required ventriculostomies. In multivariable models, older age (>60 years) was associated with higher risks for death (HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.05-4.38, p=0.036), and lower risks were noted with underlying hematologic malignancy (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09-0.98, p=0.05) and prior SOT (HR 0.153, 95% CI 0.05-0.44, p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Despite aggressive antifungal therapies, outcomes of CNS cryptococcosis in people who don't have HIV is characterized by substantial long-term neurologic sequelae. Studies are needed to understand mechanism(s) of cognitive decline and to enable better treatment algorithms.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 145 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free