Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in patients over 65 with type 2 diabetes mellitus complicating cardiorenal syndromes type II and IV

Cao M, Lin Q, Lin L, Zhang W, Zhang L

Journal of medical biochemistry, 2025

200 participants

Abstract

Background: Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is a complex clinical condition that leads to deterioration in both cardiac and renal functions. Empagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, is a novel anti-diabetic drug that also improves cardiac and renal functions. However, little research exists on the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin in elderly type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with CRS. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of empagliflozin in patients 65 and older with T2DM complicated by Type II and IV CRS.

Methods: A randomised, prospective study was conducted involving 200 patients 65 and older diagnosed with T2DM and CRS who were admitted to the cardiovascular department of Fujian Provincial Governmental Hospital from January 2020 to January 2024. Patients were randomised into an experimental group (n=100) treated with empagliflozin 10mg/day and a control group (n=100) receiving standard care. Blood glucose, cardiac and renal function indicators, adverse reactions and major adverse cardiovascular events were compared between groups. T-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and chi-square tests were performed appropriately.

Results: After one-year follow-up, patients in the experimental group showed significant improvements in fasting blood glucose, glycated haemoglobin, serum creatinine, urinary microalbumin, NT-proBNP, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter compared to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 200 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free