List of reviewers 2014
Abstract
Bauer F., Brno, Czech Republic Blahovec J., Prague, Czech Republic Gaduš J., Nitra, Slovak Republic Habart J., Prague, Czech Republic Herák D., Prague, Czech Republic Heřmánek P., Prague, Czech Republic Hůla J., Prague, Czech Republic Hutla P., Prague, Czech Republic Ivanova T., Prague, Czech Republic Kolařík L., Prague, Czech Republic Kroulík M., Prague, Czech Republic Kumhála F., Prague, Czech Republic Mlynář J., Prague, Czech Republic Müller M., Prague, Czech Republic Pecen J., Prague, Czech Republic Pexa M., Prague, Czech Republic Pražan M., Prague, Czech Republic Ružbarský J., Prešov, Slovak Republic Strebkov D.S., Moscow, Russia Res. Agr. Eng. Vol. 61, 2015 (1)
Read the paper
Related studies
- Contribution of social science to large scale biodiversity conservation: A review of research about the Natura 2000 network
- The alignment of agricultural and nature conservation policies in the European Union
- Determination of ecological significance based on geostatistical assessment: a case study from the Slovak Natura 2000 protected area
- Routledge Handbook of the Study of the Commons
- Farmers' acceptance of results-based agri-environmental schemes: A German perspective
- Approaches to Identify the Value of Seminatural Habitats for Conservation Biological Control
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.