Evidence Hub

Real-world presentation of myocardial bridging in the cath-lab: a case series

D'Amario D, Vergallo R, Elia S, Rizzo G, Ricchiuto A, Ciliberti G, Porto I, Patti G

European heart journal. Case reports, 2026

Abstract

Background: myocardial bridging (MB), an intramyocardial course of an epicardial coronary segment, is common yet frequently underrecognized on angiography, and can provoke ischaemia via multiple, overlapping mechanisms. High-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT), paired with targeted physiological testing, may improve in vivo characterization and clinical decision-making.

Case summary: we report eight contemporary, catheterization-lab cases illustrating the heterogeneous anatomy, physiology, and clinical expression of MB. Clinical presentation ranged from myocardial infarction with/without ST-elevation to acute heart failure. OCT consistently revealed recurrent morphologies, namely: homogeneous 'media-like' bands abutting the adventitia, sharp-bordered fusiform or 'moon-shaped' perivascular areas, or dynamic and asymmetric vessel distortion tracking with the muscular cuff. Management was individualized: (i) medical therapy with β-blockers when ischaemia was attributable to MB alone; (ii) OCT-guided percutaneous coronary intervention for adjacent atherosclerotic disease with precise landing-zone selection; (iii) in one case, integrated functional assessment, including dobutamine and acetylcholine testing, to unmask epicardial haemodynamic significance, microvascular dysfunction, and vasospasm, informing agent selection. Clinical outcomes were favourable, with symptom resolution and preserved or improved LV function over follow-up intervals up to 2 years.

Discussion:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free