Evidence Hub

Comparative Effectiveness of SGLT2 Inhibitors and Semaglutide in Diabetic Nephropathy: A Retrospective Observational Study

Joseph J

Cureus, 2025

10 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have demonstrated renal benefits beyond glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study compares renal outcomes and metabolic parameters in 10 patients with early diabetic nephropathy, five treated with SGLT2 inhibitors (empagliflozin or dapagliflozin) and five with semaglutide, a type of GLP-1 receptor agonist. Over a six-month follow-up, both groups showed improvement in albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) stabilization. However, semaglutide recipients had greater reductions in body weight and HbA1c, while SGLT2 inhibitor users exhibited more consistent declines in albuminuria. Both agents were well tolerated. This comparative series highlights the complementary nephroprotective profiles of both drug classes, supporting their individualized use in managing diabetic kidney disease. Further randomized trials are warranted to determine optimal sequencing or combination strategies.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 10 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free