Evidence Hub

A pitfall in diagnosing type B insulin resistance syndrome: Suspected antibody interference in a patient with insulin allergy

Manda S, Miya A, Nakamura A, Kameda H, Atsumi T

Journal of diabetes investigation, 2026

Abstract

The patient was a 73-year-old man with diabetes who developed marked hyperglycemia after several years of insulin therapy. Investigations showed marked hyperinsulinemia, positive insulin antibodies with low affinity/high binding capacity, insulin-specific IgE and eosinophil infiltration on skin biopsy, confirming insulin allergy. Positivity for insulin receptor autoantibodies (IRAb) initially led to a diagnosis of type B insulin resistance syndrome. However, a relatively low C-peptide level (1.57 ng/mL) despite severe hyperinsulinemia (1231.9 μU/mL) was key for differentiation. After cessation of insulin and initiating a multi-drug anti-diabetes regimen, the patient's glycemic control improved markedly, with a decrease in HbA1c from 12.3 to 6.7%. His serum insulin level decreased, and his IRAb test turned negative. This case highlights the fact that a high insulin antibody titer can cause a false-positive IRAb result. A disproportionately low C-peptide level in the presence of hyperinsulinemia may aid differentiation between insulin allergy and type B insulin resistance syndrome.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free