Evidence Hub

SGLT2 Inhibitors and the Risk of Arrhythmias in Heart Failure: A Network Meta-Analysis

Suresh SB, Prasad A, Ubaid MF, Farooq S, Hajra A, Jaiswal V, Malik A, Fonarow GC et al.

Journal of clinical medicine, 2025

23,701 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have revolutionized heart failure (HF) therapies and are an essential component of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT); however, their significance in arrhythmia prevention is still uncertain. This meta-analysis evaluates the benefits of SGLT2i on arrhythmias in HF. Methods: A comprehensive examination was performed with PubMed, ScienceDirect, PLOS One, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2014 to March 2025, complying with PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SGLT2i with placebo were incorporated. Primary results included ventricular arrhythmias (VA), sudden cardiac death (SCD), atrial arrhythmias, and conduction disorders. Subgroup analyses investigated the effects on arrhythmias in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Results: A total of 11 RCTs involving 23,701 patients, 11,848 on SGLT2i (mean age: 68.26 ± 10 yrs, 53.5% males) and 11,853 on placebo (mean age: 67.91 ± 10 yrs, 53% males), were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 2.71 yrs. No significant differences were reported between SGLT2i and placebo for VA [relative risk (RR): 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-1.25], I2 =0%), atrial arrhythmias (RR: 0.92 [CI: 0.67-1.27], I2 = 65.3%), or conduction disorders (RR:1.22 [CI: 0.86-1.73], I2 = 10.4%). Notably, significant reductions in risk of SCD (RR: 0.68 [CI: 0.49-0.93], I2 = 0%) and in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 23,701 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free