Evidence Hub

Blood Focused-Metabolomics and Transcriptomics Uncover Non-Linear Risk Association of Inadequate Dietary Choline Intake-Linked Metabolic Stress with MASLD Through Amino Acid Biomarkers, BCAA and MTORC 1/AKT1/IRS1 Mechanistic Mediators: A Nested Case-Control Study

Wu CH, Lin ML, Wang CY, Chang CY, Lee FJ, Cheng ML, Lin YS, Chen TW et al.

International journal of molecular sciences, 2026

125 participants

Abstract

Inadequate choline intake-induced choline metabolic stress (CMS) has been divergently linked to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), yet underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We hypothesized that CMS modifies plasma-free amino acid (PFAA) signatures to influence MASLD risk. In a nested case-control study of 125 participants, dietary choline intake and blood choline metabolites were assessed together with targeted metabolomics and transcriptomic profiling. MASLD was characterized by low choline intake, reduced plasma betaine/choline ratio (Pbcr), elevated homocysteine, increased branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), and depleted serine/glycine, achieving strong predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.90). CMS was associated with reduced lymphocytic transcripts involved in BCAA catabolism and altered mTORC1/Akt/IRS1 signaling. Nonlinear Pbcr- and intake-dependent MASLD risk patterns were attenuated after adjustment for genetic-metabolite networks. These findings identify CMS-responsive metabolic mediators supporting precision choline interventions.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 125 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free