Evidence Hub

Metabolomics Signatures of Atherosclerosis in Cardiovascular Disease: A Narrative Systematic Review

Pibiri M, Noto A, Dalu A, Muntoni S, Kopeć KK, Spada M, Atzori L, Piras C

Journal of clinical medicine, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

Background: High-throughput metabolomics studies have promoted the discovery of candidate biomarkers linked to atherosclerosis (AS). This narrative systematic review summarises metabolomics studies conducted in (1) individuals with subclinical AS (assessed by imaging techniques such as carotid intimal media thickness, IMT, and coronary artery calcium, CAC), (2) patients with established atherosclerotic plaques, and (3) individuals with AS risk factors. Methods: The systematic search was conducted in the PubMed database according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) publication date between 2009 and 2024; (ii) identification of potential biomarkers for AS in subjects with a diagnosis of AS or with one or more traits characteristic of the disease (i.e., CAC or IMT); (iii) identification of potential AS biomarkers in subjects with atherogenic clinical conditions (i.e., Down's syndrome, DS, polycystic ovarian syndrome, PCOS, and systemic lupus erythematosus, SLE); (iv) metabolomic studies; and (iv) studies in human samples. Exclusion criteria comprised the following: (i) studies on lipid metabolic diseases unrelated to AS, (ii) "omics" results not derived from metabolomics, (iii) reviews and studies in animal models or cell cultures, and (iv) systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Of 90 eligible studies screened, 24 met the inclusion criteria. Results: Across subclinical and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free