Evidence Hub

Facilitating Earlier Diagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension Using a Novel Noninvasive Diagnostic

Aben R, Burton T, Fathieh F, Nemati N, Gillins HR, Shadforth I, Ramchandani S, Bridges CR et al.

JACC. Case reports, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is frequently underdiagnosed due to limitations of transthoracic echocardiography, particularly when tricuspid regurgitant velocity (TRV) is unmeasurable. CorVista PH (point-of-care test for pulmonary hypertension [POC-PH]) is a novel, Food and Drug Administration-cleared point-of-care diagnostic with 82% sensitivity and 92% specificity for identifying mean pulmonary artery pressure elevation.

Summary: We present a patient who underwent multiple transthoracic echocardiograms negative for PH. POC-PH testing prompted right heart catheterization, revealing group 2 PH, and enabling the diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. We also present 3 patients with measurable TRV, all of whom tested positive on POC-PH and were confirmed to have PH via right heart catheterization. These included both precapillary and postcapillary PH phenotypes.

Discussion: An average of 3 transthoracic echocardiograms are required to diagnose pulmonary arterial hypertension spanning a period exceeding 2 years.

Take-home message: POC-PH demonstrated clinical utility in identifying PH where transthoracic echocardiography failed to raise suspicion.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free