Evidence Hub

Efficacy of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Daniyal SM, Khatoon NM, Rasool A, Gul I, Tabish S, Asifa S, Khalid A, Aftab Z et al.

Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism, 2026

3,187 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and type 2 diabetes. Their effect in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS), however, remains unclear. This study evaluated whether SGLT2 inhibitors reduce all-cause mortality and HF hospitalisations after TAVR.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane (CENTRAL), Scopus and Embase was performed through April 2025 for studies comparing post-TAVR outcomes between SGLT2 inhibitor users and non-users. Outcomes of interest included a composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure (HF) hospitalisation, along with the individual components of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalisation. All outcomes were extracted at 1 year. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was quantified using I2 statistics. Analyses were conducted in R (version 4.4.2).

Results: Three studies (1 RCT, 2 Observational) comprising 3187 patients met inclusion criteria. SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with a reduced risk of the composite outcome (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.65, 0.86; p < 0.01). Individually, therapy lowered all-cause mortality (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.53, 0.96; p = 0.03) and HF hospitalisations (HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.61, 0.90; p < 0.01).

Conclusion: In patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR, SGLT2 inhibitors…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,187 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free