Evidence Hub

Comparative risk of cancer associated with SGLT inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hajishah H, Mazloom P, Salehi A, Kazemi D, Samiee R, Majlesi H, Amini MJ, Meyari A et al.

Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2025

10 citations

Abstract

Aims: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the overall and site-specific cancer risk associated with SGLT2i versus DPP4i in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for cohort studies comparing cancer incidence in adult type 2 diabetes patients treated with SGLT2i versus DPP4i. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model due to significant heterogeneity (I²). Subgroup analyses by cancer type and publication bias assessment were performed.

Results: Seventeen cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, SGLT2i use was associated with a significantly lower risk of incident cancer compared to DPP4i use (Pooled RR = 0.77, 95%CI:0.70-0.84; I²=81.6%). Subgroup analyses revealed significantly lower risks for liver (RR = 0.76), lung (RR = 0.87), and prostate (RR = 0.75) cancers with SGLT2i. Trends towards lower risk were observed for colorectal (RR = 0.80) and stomach (RR = 0.69) cancers. No significant differences were found for bladder, breast, or pancreatic cancer risk.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that SGLT2 inhibitors are associated with a reduced overall risk of cancer compared to DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, particularly for liver, lung, and prostate cancers. However, these findings are based on observational data with significant heterogeneity and varying follow-up times, requiring…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free