Evidence Hub

Metabolic Alterations Identified in Urine, Plasma and Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells Reflect Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Programmed Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Aranzazu Santiago‐Hernandez, Paula J. Martínez, Marta Agudiez, Angeles Heredero, Laura Gonzalez‐Calero, Alma Yuste‐Montalvo, Vanesa Esteban, Gonzalo Aldámiz‐Echevarría et al.

Antioxidants, 2021

8 citations

Abstract

Atherosclerosis is the predominant pathology associated to premature deaths due to cardiovascular disease. However, early intervention based on a personalized diagnosis of cardiovascular risk is very limited. We have previously identified metabolic alterations during atherosclerosis development in a rabbit model and in subjects suffering from an acute coronary syndrome. Here we aim to identify specific metabolic signatures which may set the basis for novel tools aiding cardiovascular risk diagnosis in clinical practice. In a cohort of subjects with programmed coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), we have performed liquid chromatography and targeted mass spectrometry analysis in urine and plasma. The role of vascular smooth muscle cells from human aorta (HA-VSMCs) was also investigated by analyzing the intra and extracellular metabolites in response to a pro-atherosclerotic stimulus. Statistically significant variation was considered if p value < 0.05 (Mann-Whitney test). Urinary trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), arabitol and spermidine showed higher levels in the CVrisk group compared with a control group; while glutamine and pantothenate showed lower levels. The same trend was found for plasma TMAO and glutamine. Plasma choline, acetylcholine and valine were also decreased in CVrisk group, while pyruvate was found increased. In the secretome of HA-VSMCs, TMAO, pantothenate, glycerophosphocholine, glutathion, spermidine and acetylcholine increased after pro-atherosclerotic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free