Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of Buyang-Huanwu-Tang (Boyang-Hwano-Tang) in patients with vascular dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Da Woon Kim, Sang Ho Kim, H. Kook, I. Jung

Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 2022

1,254 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Buyang-Huanwu-Tang (Boyang-Hwano-Tang, BHT) is a widely used traditional Chinese herbal medicine for treating ischemic stroke in South Korea and China. Its efficacy in vascular dementia has been reported. There has been no comprehensive systematic review of BHT for vascular dementia.

METHODS

We searched 15 electronic databases from inception to November 25, 2021. We included only randomised controlled clinical trials. Studies that used BHT alone or with Western medicine were included. Two independent reviewers conducted the screening, data extraction, and the Cochrane risk of bias and quality of evidence assessment. A meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 18 eligible trials with 1254 participants were included. Of these, 15 were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results suggested that BHT alone (mean difference [MD] 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.94 to 5.56; P = 0.55) was similar to Western medicine alone in terms of the Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE). Additive BHT therapy showed a significant improvement in the MMSE (MD 1.42; 95% CI 0.28 to 2.56; P = 0.01), Hasegawa Dementia Scale score (MD 3.91; 95% CI 2.87 to 4.94; P < 0.001) and total effective rate (risk ratio 1.35; 95% CI 1.20 to 1.52; P < 0.001). The overall risk of bias was unclear or high. The quality of evidence was very low to moderate. Only four studies reported minor or no adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

The results support the clinical use of BHT for the improvement of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,254 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free