Evidence Hub

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants have better efficacy and equivalent safety compared to warfarin in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

In-Soo Kim, Hyun-Jung Kim, Tae-Hoon Kim, J. Uhm, B. Joung, Moon-Hyoung Lee, H. Pak

Journal of Cardiology, 2018

49 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with atrial fibrillation (AF), depending on dose and/or renal function.

METHODS

After systematically searching the databases (Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science), 5 phase III randomized controlled trials and reported data according to subgroups of elderly/non-elderly AF patients, comparing any NOACs and warfarin were included. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were stroke/systemic thromboembolism and major bleeding.

RESULTS

(1) NOACs showed better efficacy than warfarin in elderly patients [RR 0.83 (0.69-1.00), p=0.04, I2=55%], but equivalent efficacy in non-elderly patients. (2) NOACs reduced major bleeding compared to warfarin in non-elderly (p<0.001) and had comparable safety to warfarin in elderly patients. (3) Even in elderly patients with moderately impaired renal function, NOACs had a safety profile comparable to that of warfarin for major bleeding if dose reduction was reached appropriately [pooled RR 0.82 (0.35-1.88), p=0.63, I2=63%]. (4) All-cause mortality was lower with NOACs in non-elderly patients [RR 0.89 (0.83-0.95), p=0.001, I2=0%], and with standard-dose NOAC group of elderly patients [RR 0.93 (0.86-1.00), p=0.04, I2=0%] compared to warfarin.

CONCLUSIONS

For elderly patients (aged ≥75 years), NOACs showed better efficacy and equivalent safety compared to warfarin even in those with moderately…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free