Evidence Hub

Therapeutic effectiveness of probiotics for atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with subgroup analysis

Kyunghoon Kim, Eun Lee, Mina Kim, K. Lee, I. Sol, T. Min, H. Yang, Soo-Jong Hong

Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology, 2023

1,382 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effect of probiotics in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) is inconclusive, partially due to the heterogeneities of AD.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of probiotics in the treatment of AD with a subgroup analysis according to country, severity of AD, duration of supplementation, and probiotic strain.

METHODS

Original articles reporting the therapeutic efficacy of probiotics for AD were identified by searching PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, and Embase from inception to September 30, 2022.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 1,382 patients with AD from 25 randomized controlled trials. Probiotic supplementation was effective for the treatment of AD, reflected in a significant decrease in the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index (SMD, -4.0; 95%CI, -7.3 to -0.7). The subgroup analysis showed a significant therapeutic effect for AD among patients with mild or moderate AD (SMD, -1.4; 95%CIs -2.2 to -0.7), in those supplemented for more than three months (SMD, -5.1; 95%CIs -9.7 to -0.4), and in those supplemented with a probiotic that contained Lactobacillus spp. strains combined with or without other strains (SMD, -4.4; 95%CIs -8.0 to -0.8). In addition, the therapeutic effects of probiotics showed differences according to country and geographic region.

CONCLUSIONS

Probiotics can be beneficial for the treatment of AD, and their therapeutic effect may be individually tailored to improve it based on the severity of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,382 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free