Evidence Hub

Effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided needle-knife therapy for patients with spinal pain disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Do-Young Kim, Joon-Seok Lee, Sook-Hyun Lee, Y. Lee, Ju Yeon Kim, In Heo, Jae-Heung Cho, Byung-Kwan Seo et al.

Frontiers in Medicine, 2025

2,107 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Background Requirements for the development of pre-surgical therapies for spinal pain disorders have arisen, with ultrasound-guided needle-knife therapy (US-NKT) gaining popularity as a minimally invasive treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of US-NKT, focusing on its effectiveness and safety. Methods A comprehensive literature survey was conducted by using 12 databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of US-NKT with control in patients with spinal pain disorders. Characteristics of RCTs were extracted. Also, a meta-analysis of pain and physical function (PF) outcomes was performed at 1-week, 1-month, and 3-month follow-ups. Adverse events (AEs) were also analyzed. Results Of the 1,694 articles screened, 23 RCTs (n = 2,107) met the inclusion criteria, with 60.9% addressing spinal degenerative arthropathy. US-NKT significantly reduced pain at 1 week (standardized mean difference [SMD]: −1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −1.42 to −0.79; I2 = 73%) and 1 month (SMD: −1.74; 95% CI: −2.50 to −0.98; I2 = 95%). However, the effects were not statistically significant at 3 months. PF improved significantly at all time .points, with the strongest effect at 1 week (SMD: −0.92; 95% CI: −1.42 to −0.42; I2 = 71%). US-NKT demonstrated superior benefits for pain and PF compared with recommended therapies (at all-time points) or conventional NKT (at 1 week and 1 month). AEs were reported in 43.5% of RCTs, with fewer incidents in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,107 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free