Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Ecklonia cava Kjellman Extract Complex in Respiratory Health: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial

Seong-Cheon Woo, Su Won Lee, Jayun Kim, In Chul Jung, J. Son, Beom-joon Lee, Sang Kwon, Jung-Hee Byeon et al.

Food Science & Nutrition, 2026

106 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

ABSTRACT Industrialization, air pollution, and respiratory infections have highlighted the importance of maintaining respiratory health. Ecklonia cava Kjellman (EC) has anti‐inflammatory, antioxidative, and anti‐allergic effects and therapeutic potential for respiratory symptoms. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Ecklonia cava Kjellman extract complex (EEC), composed of EC and Chrysanthemum indicum Linnaeus ( C. indicum ) extract, in respiratory health. A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multicenter clinical trial was conducted. Participants (n = 106) were randomly allocated to the EEC and placebo groups at a 1:1 ratio and administered EEC or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks, with four visits (screening and weeks 0, 6, and 12). Breathlessness, cough, and sputum scale (BCSS), pulmonary function test (forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expired volume in 1 s (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC), St. George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ), visual analogue scale (VAS), and modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC) were assessed. BCSS (total, breathlessness, and sputum scores), FEV1, and VAS (cough and sputum) were significantly improved in the EEC group compared with the placebo group. No significant differences in SGRQ and mMRC between the groups. Safety assessments showed no severe adverse events or clinically significant changes. Given the established pharmacological mechanisms of EC, including its anti‐inflammatory, antioxidative, anti‐allergic, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 106 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free