Evidence Hub

Response analysis for injected and non-injected lesions and of the safety and efficacy of superficial and deep/visceral RP1 injection in the registrational cohort of anti–PD-1–failed melanoma patients of the IGNYTE trial

G. In, M. Wong, Joseph J. Sacco, Eva Muñoz Couselo, D. Schadendorf, Georgia M. Beasley, J. Niu, B. Chmielowski et al.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2025

104 participants

Abstract

9537

Background:

The IGNYTE trial (NCT03767348) primary analysis of RP1 (vusolimogene oderparepvec) plusnivolumab (nivo) showed clinically meaningful durable efficacy (ORR, 32.9%; median DOR, 33.7 mos, by RECIST 1.1 and independent central review) in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma, including deep responses in non-injected visceral lesions, demonstrating systemic efficacy. Here we present an analysis of efficacy in injected and non-injected lesions and safety and efficacy in pts receiving superficial and/or deep/visceral RP1 injections.

Methods:

Pts with confirmed progression during anti–PD-1 ± anti–CTLA-4 for ≥8 weeks were enrolled. RP1 (1×10

6

PFU/mL x1, then Q2W 1×10

7

PFU/mL x7, up to 10 mL) was injected into superficial and/or deep/visceral tumors using imaging guidance. Nivo was given (240 mg Q2W) from the 2

nd

dose of RP1 through dose 8, then alone (240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W) for 2 yrs, with additional RP1 injections allowed if indicated.

Results:

For the 46 responding patients by RECIST 1.1 (of the 140 enrolled) 197 lesions were measured, 78 injected, 119 non-injected of which 98.7% and 96.6% had any reduction and 93.5% and 79.0% >30% reduction, respectively. For visceral lesions, 85.7% of injected and 96.2% of non-injected lesions had any reduction and 85.7% and 65.4% had >30% reduction, respectively. 104 patients had superficial only injections, and 36 had deep/visceral +/- superficial injections. Treatment-related adverse event (TRAEs) rates were comparable…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free