Evidence Hub

Staged endovascular management for non-maturing arteriovenous fistulas: A single-center retrospective cohort study

Yunbeom Lee, Hyoung Nam Lee, Youngjong Cho, Sung-Joon Park, Sangjoon Lee, I. Nam

Journal of Vascular Access, 2026

54 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of a staged endovascular management for non-maturing arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and identify prognostic factors associated with patency.

METHODS

Between September 2016 and June 2025, 67 patients (age: 62.8 ± 10.8 years; male: 67.2%) underwent staged endovascular management according to a standardized institutional protocol. This strategy prioritizes correction of underlying stenotic lesions, even when the severity of stenosis is mild. Embolization of collateral veins was performed in cases of persistent maturation failure.

RESULTS

Technical and clinical success rates were 97.4% (76/78) and 83.6% (56/67), respectively, with a complication rate of 5.1% (4/78). Initial PTA achieved clinical success in 54 of 67 patients (80.6%). Among 11 patients with persistent maturation failure, four underwent collateral embolization, resulting in clinical success in 2. Postintervention primary and assisted primary patency rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 85.7%, 81.7%, and 73.1%, and 98.2%, 96.3%, and 94.2%, respectively. Diabetes mellitus (HR, 5.43; 95% CI, 1.23-23.96; p = 0.026) and thrombotic occlusion (HR, 7.05; 95% CI, 2.62-18.93; p < 0.001) were significant predictors of reduced primary patency. The reintervention rate was 0.45 events/access-year. Outcomes did not differ significantly according to lesion characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

A staged endovascular approach offers a safe and effective strategy for managing…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 54 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free