Evidence Hub

Differential organ-specific tumor response to first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in non-small cell lung cancer—a retrospective cohort study

Qi Wang, Yujia Fang, Chunyu Li, T. Leong, M. Provencio, I. Oh, Zhemin Zhang, C. Su

Translational Lung Cancer Research, 2023

105 participants · 12 citations

Abstract

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) possess remarkable clinical effectiveness in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Different immune profiles of tumors may play a key role in the efficacy of treatment with ICIs. This article aimed to determine the differential organ responses to ICI in individuals with metastatic NSCLC. Methods This research analyzed data of advanced NSCLC patients receiving first-line treatment with ICIs. Major organs such as the liver, lung, adrenal glands, lymph nodes and brain were assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and RECIST-improved organ-specific response criteria. Results A retrospective analysis was conducted on a total of 105 individuals with advanced NSCLC with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50% who received single agent anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies as first-line therapy. Overall, 105 (100%), 17 (16.2%), 15 (14.3%), 13 (12.4%), and 45 (42.8%) individuals showed measurable lung tumors and liver, brain, adrenal, and other lymph node metastases at baseline. The median size of the lung, liver, brain, adrenal gland, and lymph nodes were 3.4, 3.1, 2.8, 1.9, and 1.8 cm, respectively. The results recorded mean response times of 2.1, 3.4, 2.5, 3.1, and 2.3 months, respectively. Organ-specific overall response rates (ORRs) were 67%, 30.6%, 34%, 39%, and 59.1%, respectively, with the liver having the lowest remission rate and lung lesions having…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 105 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free