Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of cabozantinib plus nivolumab in advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a nationwide multicenter study

Chang Gon Kim, Junkyu Kim, In-Ho Kim, E. Jung, Hyeon-Su Im, Byung Woog Kang, Ji Hyun Park, Joo-Hwan Park et al.

Oncoimmunology, 2026

62 participants

Abstract

ABSTRACT Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) represents a biologically heterogeneous group of tumors for which optimal systemic treatment strategies remain poorly defined despite recent therapeutic advances. To address this gap, we evaluated the clinical activity and safety of cabozantinib plus nivolumab in patients with advanced nccRCC. In this nationwide, multicenter retrospective cohort study conducted in the Republic of Korea, 62 patients received the combination across multiple lines of therapy, with most treated in the first-line setting. Papillary RCC was the most common histologic subtype (50.0%), followed by FH-deficient (22.6%), TFE3-rearranged (9.7%), chromophobe (6.5%), collecting duct (6.5%), and unclassified tumors (4.8%). With a median follow-up of 22.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.4–29.1), the objective response rate (ORR) was 45.2% (95% CI, 32.4–57.9) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 93.6% (95% CI, 87.3–99.8). Responses were seen across histologic subtypes (ORR = 48.4% in papillary, 50.0% in FH-deficient, 50.0% in TFE3-rearranged, 25.0% in chromophobe, 25.0% in collecting duct, and 33.3% in unclassified tumors; P = 0.876). Median progression-free and overall survival were 9.7 months (95% CI, 7.7–11.6) and 22.0 months (95% CI, 15.2–28.7), respectively. Grade 3–4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 46.8% of patients, and treatment discontinuation due to toxicity was reported in 6.5%. These findings demonstrate that…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 62 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free