Evidence Hub

A phase 1/2 study to investigate the safety and efficacy of OBX-115 engineered tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) cell therapy in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors

A. Schoenfeld, Allison Betof Warner, J. Chesney, S. Thomas, Omid Hamid, G. In, A. Shoushtari, Y. Samhouri et al.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2024

5 citations

Abstract

TPS9599 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved outcomes for pts with solid tumor malignancies; however, most pts relapse and treatment options are limited. Unengineered TIL cell therapy has shown promising efficacy in pts with ICI-resistant melanoma (1,2) and non-small cell lung cancer ([NSCLC] 3,4), but requires co-administration of systemic high-dose IL2, which is associated with safety risks and limits pt eligibility. OBX-115 TIL are engineered to express membrane-bound IL15 (mbIL15) under dose-dependent regulation using acetazolamide (ACZ), an FDA-approved small-molecule diuretic, avoiding the need for high-dose IL2. A first-in-human single-institution study (NCT05470283) evaluating the safety of OBX-115 in metastatic melanoma is ongoing. The current study (NCT06060613) is enrolling pts with solid tumors at multiple US sites using centralized manufacturing. Methods: This phase 1/2, single-arm, open-label, nonrandomized, multicenter study will assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the OBX-115 engineered autologous TIL cell therapy regimen in pts with histologically confirmed unresectable Stage IIIC, IIID, or Stage IV metastatic melanoma (excluding uveal) with documented radiographic progression after systemic therapy containing an anti–PD‐1/PD-L1 agent (if adjuvant, progression during or within 12 wks after the last dose) and received a BRAF inhibitor ± MEK inhibitor if BRAF V600 mutation-positive OR metastatic NSCLC previously treated…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free