Evidence Hub

1983-LB: A Phase 1 Study of ID110521156, a Small Molecule Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist, in Healthy Subjects

In-Gyu Je, Yujung Kyoung, S. Yoo, E. Hong, Mincheol Kim, Jiyoung Yang, Heejae Won, SeungHwan Lee et al.

Diabetes, 2025

14 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have emerged as effective therapeutic strategies for type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity. To address the limitations of peptide-based GLP-1RAs, we developed ID110521156, a novel small-molecule GLP-1RA. In nonclinical studies, ID110521156 exhibited favorable pharmacokinetic property for oral administration and potent glucose-lowering efficacy with wide safety margin. Based on these findings, a first-in-human study was initiated in the Republic of Korea [NCT06063291].

Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose (SAD) study was conducted in healthy subjects to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ID110521156. Eligible subjects in the SAD cohorts (total 24, N=8/cohort) were randomly assigned to receive a single oral dose of ID110521156 or placebo in a 6:2 ratio. Additionally, a food effect study was performed in a separate cohort (N=12) using a randomized, two-sequence, crossover design to assess the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of ID110521156.

Results: During dose escalation, systemic exposures (AUClast ) increased in a dose-proportional manner with a 95% confidence interval of 0.0623-1.0219 for the slope of the regression line. A total of 32 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 14 subjects in the SAD cohorts. Commonly reported TEAEs were gastrointestinal-related, including nausea and vomiting. No serious…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 14 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free